Lynn Johannson, Advisor, Sustainability and ESG
January 4th, 2024
Crowdfund Insider | JD Alois | Oct 15, 2019
Last week, Crowdfund Insider reported on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforcement action against Telegram and the issuance of Gram tokens. The move by the SEC is a doozy and telling.
First, Telegram sold about $1.7 billion in a SAFT (simple agreement for future tokens) that appeared to abide by the rules. Telegram filed a Form D and apparently only sold to accredited investors in the US. As CI has heard, the token offering was wildly popular at the time of the offering.
But the SEC’s “emergency action” was predicated on the expectation the Gram tokens would be available to the general public and thus akin to an initial public offering (IPO). Once the Grams hid various and sundry crypto exchanges – anyone would be able to purchase them – not just the accredited investor types. In the US, an IPO requires registration with the SEC, a significant undertaking.
We have received several comments on the SEC’s move to target an issuer that is not US-based but sold to US investors, approximately 39 purchasers who committed in total $424.5 million, according to the SEC’s complaint.
Dror Futter, an insider who frequently comments on the emerging digital asset sector and a partner at Rimon Law, told Crowdfund Insider that this is a reminder that the SEC carries a very big stick:
“For those that thought the Block.one settlement represented a kinder, gentler SEC, a reminder that the SEC not only has considerable enforcement tools but is willing to use them,” said Futter. “Telegram certainly has the war chest to fight and at least on the surface, appears to have a better fact pattern than Kik. If this case actually makes it to trial, it will represent an interesting opportunity for a ruling on the securities status of SAFTs. Literally billions of dollars were raised using these instruments. Most provided for conversion to tokens when their platform went live. Presumably, over the next months, more platforms will come online and raise the same set of issues.”
In comparing the SEC complaint against Kik and the one delivered to Telegram, the SEC seems to have taken somewhat different positions on the nature of the securities violation, explained Futter.
“In Kik, the SEC stated: “Although Kik’s SAFT specifically stated that the SAFT was itself a security, it failed to state that the Kin to be delivered under the SAFT were securities sold pursuant to the SAFTs. And although Kik’s PPM claimed that the offer and sale of the SAFTs were subject to an exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder, among other United States laws, Kik did not claim any exemption for the offer and sale of Kin through the SAFT. As such, Kik’s offer and sale of the SAFTs and Kik’s offer and sale of the Kin purchased under the SAFTs were not registered.”
In other words, it was the issuance of the Kik token that constituted the securities regulation.
“With Telegram, the complaint stated that once purchasers resell the tokens “Telegram will have completed its unregistered offering with billions of Grams trading on multiple platforms to a dispersed group of investors.” In other words, it is the resale of tokens upon issuance that gives rise to the securities violation.”
Philip Moustakis, counsel at Seward & Kissel LLP and former SEC Senior Counsel who was a member of the SEC’s Cyber Unit from its inception, where he focused on cryptocurrencies and initial coin offerings, had this to say:
“According to the SEC’s complaint, between January and March 2018, Telegram raised approximately $1.7 billion from sales of 2.9 billion Grams to 171 investors, $424.5 million of which was raised from 39 U.S. investors. One thing that makes the case different from some other ICOs the SEC has pursued is that the tokens have not yet been delivered to the investors. This allowed the enforcement staff to step in and attempt to prevent the tokens from being disseminated in the U.S. and resold in the secondary market, at which point it would have been a far more complicated endeavor to unwind or bring the offering into compliance.”
Moustakis said the case has significance because it shows the SEC will pursue overseas issuers of digital assets or cryptocurrencies who offer and sell those assets into the U.S. or otherwise access the U.S. capital markets.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Support NCFA by Following us on Twitter!Follow @NCFACanada ![]() |
January 4th, 2024
January 25th, 2023
June 1st, 2021
September 9th, 2020
July 17th, 2020
August 22nd, 2019
September 26th, 2018
July 9th, 2018
March 19th, 2018
January 3rd, 2018
September 25th, 2017
July 31st, 2017
June 20th, 2017
May 10th, 2017
May 9th, 2017
December 14th, 2016
NCFA Canada
Craig Asano
CEO and Executive Director
casano@ncfacanada.org
ncfacanada.org
Leave a Reply